Brompton Ralph – Away
My first away game of the season which also doubled up as my
last away game of the season as it was the last game of the season, well the
league season anyway. I do like travelling away, so this season has been
disappointing as I only made one away trip – oh how I hate rain.
The game can only be remembered for comments made by the
Stowey fielders when defending a low total. Dan likes to go down on one knee
and Adrian was comparing sweating to a disgraced celebrity.
Enough said of that. Stowey lost and are officially the
strongest side in the West Somerset League, as they are holding up the rest. A
well organised Brompton side was always on the front foot, right from the first
ball and if Rabbit didn’t score 43 the game would off been over sooner.
So what are my highlights of the 2014 season? Well not much
to be frank. So here are some:
- Carl’s match report v Lydeard St Lawrence
- Matt Coombes’ 97 v Fitzhead
- Julian losing his way going to LSL
- The every improving Lee Rich, he must be the leading wicket taker in the 2nds.
- Stephen Miller making the step from Under 15’s to senior cricket and in some matches showing the seniors how to play!
- Generally being a very sporting division to umpire in, especially as it is my first full season as an umpire. Oh no, Bishops Hull are coming down!
In all the games I umpired, I only had to give the following
decisions:
- 3 x LBW’s – please know the laws before you appeal, but that doesn’t mean I’m right!
- 2 x run outs (both in the same game)
- 2 x caught behinds to faint nicks
That is apart from boundaries, wides and no balls which is
part and parcel in any umpires book. I am very happy with my first full year,
but something happened on Sunday which was brought to my attention. Apparently
there has been a rule change in Law 42 – fair and unfair play.
But when I looked it up when I got home on the MCC Laws of
Cricket website nothing has been changed, it clearly still states:
(b) Bowling of high full pitched balls
(i) Any delivery, other than a slow paced one, which passes or would have passed on the full above waist height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease is to be deemed dangerous and unfair, whether or not it is likely to inflict physical injury on the striker.
(ii) A slow delivery which passes or would have passed on the full above shoulder height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease is to be deemed dangerous and unfair, whether or not it is likely to inflict physical injury on the striker.
(i) Any delivery, other than a slow paced one, which passes or would have passed on the full above waist height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease is to be deemed dangerous and unfair, whether or not it is likely to inflict physical injury on the striker.
(ii) A slow delivery which passes or would have passed on the full above shoulder height of the striker standing upright at the popping crease is to be deemed dangerous and unfair, whether or not it is likely to inflict physical injury on the striker.
Though I whole heartedly agree with Jub in
how do you define a slow delivery, I still think I was right in not giving a no
ball. But hey, if someone can tell / show me different I will accept that, but
I did get the above from the MCC website and that is what I have been taught. Is it a local rule to the West Somerset League?
Right, enough of that, the Under 30’s v the
Over 30’s. For once the oldun’s won, by the narrowest of margins and Mark
Sortwell got bowled by an 11 year old, well bowled Kieran, shame your dad caught you out.
Other good news is that Nosworthy has gone
(hurrah) and Australia lost to Zimbabwe (double hurrah!). SMS will return next
week, but now it is Thatchers time.